I got a new toy this week! A 50mm f1.8 lens, so well loved in the photography community that they call it the “nifty fifty.” I totally love it!
As with far too many things in my life, however, the circuitous route by which it came to me makes for both a cautionary tale and excellent blog fodder.
I’d been eyeballing it for weeks, and knew I could buy it on Amazon.com for about $135US. I also happened to have $40 in Amazon.com gift certificates, for my last couple of blog tours. When I got a $100 paypal payment in $US, I figured it was meant to be. I have $140US to spend, the lens I covet costs $135. Hook me up!
Problem: Amazon.com doesn’t ship lenses to Canada. (And Amazon.ca doesn’t accept Amazon.com gift certificates.)
Solution: Find benevolent American friend willing to re-ship lens to me.
Problem: Amazon.com doesn’t accept paypal. If I cash it out, I lose both ways on the exchange.
Solution: Use $$ in paypal account to bid on $100 Amazon gift card on eBay. Brilliant! (Beloved thought of this one. He’s so clever!)
Problem: I’m 80c (yes, eighty CENTS) short when I go to check out of the Amazon store. Friggin’ taxes!
Solution: use dregs of paypal account to buy a $5 gift card.
Problem: Lens finally arrives with $56.90 payment outstanding to UPS. Nanny doesn’t have the cash on hand to cover it. (I thought the $56.90 was the delivery charge, but my American friend had already paid nearly $20 for that. It was GST and duty. *choke*)
Solution: Must wait overnight and leave cheque for UPS.
Total cost to buy new lens from Amazon: $258.42 Cnd.
What it would have cost me to buy it from the Henry’s around the corner: $182.45. Sigh.
Oh well, my out-of-pocket is still only about $70. Not bad for a lens that I am completely and utterly in love with!
It took me a while to get used to the manual focus again (the 50mm f1.8 doesn’t autofocus with the D40) and of using my feet to do the zooming, but this lens is so sharp and takes the most lovely pictures. The f1.8 means that it has a particularly wide aperture, much wider than the f3.5 or so I can get with my kit lens. I’ve always liked playing with depth of field, and this lens is just amazing for that. (Depth of field refers to the amount of the photo that is in focus. In a wide depth of field, using say f20, all the details would be in focus. In a short depth of field, you can highlight what you want to be in focus and throw the foreground and background out of focus. /photography lesson)
You can see how much fun I’ve had with DoF in this week’s photos:
(In this case, the out-of-focus areas are from motion. This is a technique called ‘panning’ where you move your camera to follow a moving subject (theoretically) keeping your subject in focus while the background is blurred. I just love the expression on Tristan’s face!)
(I’m playing fast and loose with the definition of “this week’s photos”. You’ve already seen the peanut butter jar picture and the picture of Tristan and Lucas, so I slipped in a few extras of the pretty flowers. I found them growing wild by the side of the road near the Experimental Farm and didn’t figure you’d mind! Sometimes it’s hard to choose just one picture for the day, and sometimes it’s hell coming up with something, ANYTHING that will do for the day! Also, those flowers represent what I truly love about my 365 project: I never would have stopped and got out of my car to photograph or admire those flowers before — and I spent a lovely and restorative 20 or 30 minutes creeping around and even lying sprawled on my belly taking pictures of them. That in and of itself was a gift!)
And here’s one last thought for this week, a photo that I didn’t take that speaks for itself:
(With props – and apologies? – to Michael David Murphy of Unphotographable, and to Kate , who first exposed me to his work.)
The photographer’s equivalent of the one that got away, I guess!