<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worthy words and banished words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danigirl.ca/blog/2009/03/17/worthy-words-and-banished-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danigirl.ca/blog/2009/03/17/worthy-words-and-banished-words/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:55:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry</title>
		<link>http://danigirl.ca/blog/2009/03/17/worthy-words-and-banished-words/comment-page-1/#comment-66730</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danigirl.ca/blog/?p=1871#comment-66730</guid>
		<description>I concur with  my mum!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with  my mum!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priscilla</title>
		<link>http://danigirl.ca/blog/2009/03/17/worthy-words-and-banished-words/comment-page-1/#comment-66712</link>
		<dc:creator>Priscilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danigirl.ca/blog/?p=1871#comment-66712</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Colleen in nominating &quot;impact/impacted.&quot;  I hate &quot;impact/impacted&quot; used as a verb. I&#039;m an editor by profession, and I always change my authors&#039; &quot;impacts&quot; to &quot;affects&quot; or something similar.

I&#039;m with you on &quot;utilize,&quot; too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Colleen in nominating &#8220;impact/impacted.&#8221;  I hate &#8220;impact/impacted&#8221; used as a verb. I&#8217;m an editor by profession, and I always change my authors&#8217; &#8220;impacts&#8221; to &#8220;affects&#8221; or something similar.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you on &#8220;utilize,&#8221; too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fawn</title>
		<link>http://danigirl.ca/blog/2009/03/17/worthy-words-and-banished-words/comment-page-1/#comment-66633</link>
		<dc:creator>Fawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danigirl.ca/blog/?p=1871#comment-66633</guid>
		<description>I think the &quot;utilize&quot; thing is the one rule that REALLY stuck with me when I read Strunk &amp; White&#039;s Elements of Style years ago.  It&#039;s been a pet peeve ever since, which got me into one of the very rare arguments I had with my best girlfriend in university.  Her argument was that her mom was an English major and used the word &quot;utilize&quot;.

However, they also had an issue with the word &quot;moisturize&quot; (for skin cream ads) preferring &quot;moisten&quot;, which goes to show they were both men.  I think it was a new-ish word at the time the book was written, but growing up with the word, I&#039;d say &quot;moisturize&quot; is to replenish the skin&#039;s moisture content from the inside, while &quot;moisten&quot; would mean taking a damp face-cloth to one&#039;s skin. :)  And I&#039;m only going into this lengthy comment because when I was thinking that one through, it made me laugh to think about &quot;moisturizing&quot; one&#039;s garden.  LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the &#8220;utilize&#8221; thing is the one rule that REALLY stuck with me when I read Strunk &amp; White&#8217;s Elements of Style years ago.  It&#8217;s been a pet peeve ever since, which got me into one of the very rare arguments I had with my best girlfriend in university.  Her argument was that her mom was an English major and used the word &#8220;utilize&#8221;.</p>
<p>However, they also had an issue with the word &#8220;moisturize&#8221; (for skin cream ads) preferring &#8220;moisten&#8221;, which goes to show they were both men.  I think it was a new-ish word at the time the book was written, but growing up with the word, I&#8217;d say &#8220;moisturize&#8221; is to replenish the skin&#8217;s moisture content from the inside, while &#8220;moisten&#8221; would mean taking a damp face-cloth to one&#8217;s skin. <img src='http://danigirl.ca/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   And I&#8217;m only going into this lengthy comment because when I was thinking that one through, it made me laugh to think about &#8220;moisturizing&#8221; one&#8217;s garden.  LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ingrid</title>
		<link>http://danigirl.ca/blog/2009/03/17/worthy-words-and-banished-words/comment-page-1/#comment-66629</link>
		<dc:creator>Ingrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danigirl.ca/blog/?p=1871#comment-66629</guid>
		<description>For me it&#039;s &quot;pick up&quot;. I think that means to lift up, but some people use it to say &quot;buy&quot;. I guess that shows that English is not my mother tongue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me it&#8217;s &#8220;pick up&#8221;. I think that means to lift up, but some people use it to say &#8220;buy&#8221;. I guess that shows that English is not my mother tongue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colleen</title>
		<link>http://danigirl.ca/blog/2009/03/17/worthy-words-and-banished-words/comment-page-1/#comment-66627</link>
		<dc:creator>colleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danigirl.ca/blog/?p=1871#comment-66627</guid>
		<description>That should read incorrect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That should read incorrect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colleen</title>
		<link>http://danigirl.ca/blog/2009/03/17/worthy-words-and-banished-words/comment-page-1/#comment-66626</link>
		<dc:creator>colleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danigirl.ca/blog/?p=1871#comment-66626</guid>
		<description>I would ban the incprrect use of &quot;impact/inpacted&quot;. It drives me crazy. Whatever happened to affected?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would ban the incprrect use of &#8220;impact/inpacted&#8221;. It drives me crazy. Whatever happened to affected?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alison</title>
		<link>http://danigirl.ca/blog/2009/03/17/worthy-words-and-banished-words/comment-page-1/#comment-66605</link>
		<dc:creator>alison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danigirl.ca/blog/?p=1871#comment-66605</guid>
		<description>Have I given you my anti &quot;signage&quot; rant yet?  There&#039;s a perfectly good word for more than one sign.  It&#039;s &#039;signs&#039;.  Oh, and the radio commercials for a lottery that announce &quot;Over 1 million dollars in prizing&quot;.  Prizing?  As a noun? And that&#039;s not even getting into &#039;over&#039; instead of &#039;more than&#039;.

And I&#039;m kinda tired of &#039;shovel-ready&#039; in the budget/economic stimulus stories on the news.  As for corporate-speak, I could live very happily if I never heard &#039;leverage the knowledge base&#039; and &#039;stakeholders&#039; again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have I given you my anti &#8220;signage&#8221; rant yet?  There&#8217;s a perfectly good word for more than one sign.  It&#8217;s &#8216;signs&#8217;.  Oh, and the radio commercials for a lottery that announce &#8220;Over 1 million dollars in prizing&#8221;.  Prizing?  As a noun? And that&#8217;s not even getting into &#8216;over&#8217; instead of &#8216;more than&#8217;.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m kinda tired of &#8216;shovel-ready&#8217; in the budget/economic stimulus stories on the news.  As for corporate-speak, I could live very happily if I never heard &#8216;leverage the knowledge base&#8217; and &#8216;stakeholders&#8217; again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kgirl</title>
		<link>http://danigirl.ca/blog/2009/03/17/worthy-words-and-banished-words/comment-page-1/#comment-66597</link>
		<dc:creator>kgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danigirl.ca/blog/?p=1871#comment-66597</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be happy to never hear the words, &#039;going forward&#039; again. 

&#039;MummyIpoopedcomewipeme&#039; I&#039;d also be ok with not hearing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be happy to never hear the words, &#8216;going forward&#8217; again. </p>
<p>&#8216;MummyIpoopedcomewipeme&#8217; I&#8217;d also be ok with not hearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

