Sometimes there are things that you notice, that tick you off, but that you just kind of take as a given in life. Like transit systems…(no , not again, I was just teasing)
But then someone says, “Hey, you know, I don’t think this is right. I think maybe we should take a better look at this.” That’s what politician Lorenzo Berardinetti is doing with a new private member’s bill in the Ontario legislature, as described in a recent article from the Globe and Mail. It seems Berardinetti and his wife compared notes on a number of products and services for men and women, and found that women are generally paying a lot more for the same thing. Well, duh! But he asserts, and the more I think about it, the more I agree with him, that this entrenched inequality is discrimination under the Canadian Human Rights Act.
The Toronto Star conducted a bit of its own research, finding that women paid more for similar clothes at GAP, for deodorant, shampoo and cologne at Shoppers Drug Mart, for services at beauty salons and for dry cleaning. The only place they didn’t find a significant difference is in footwear –specifically, socks and running shoes.
But why stop there? I know there are more examples of this out there — pockets, for one. Why, why, WHY there are almost never any decent pockets in women’s clothing? They wouldn’t dare make a pair of dress pants for men without pockets, so why don’t they put pockets in women’s pants? The absolute worst offenders are maternity clothing manufacturers. I don’t think I owned a single pair of maternity pants aside from jeans, nor a single skirt, that had pockets.
Have you noticed any other situations where there is a gender inequality that our hardworking politicians need to address?
Related posts (automatically generated):
- Oh no, not another post about pants Oh happy day. Today is a day to celebrate, my bloggy peeps. A mere yay day is not going to do it this time. Today, we dance on table tops, buy drinks for strangers, and beam beautific smiles that will make the neighbours wonder what we’re up to. It’s a...
- Transitional pants Like most women I know, I have jeans in an array of sizes. Sexy jeans, for when I’m feeling fit; ordinary jeans; and fat jeans. I’ve been living in my fat jeans on weekends since Labour Day, and all my work pants seem to have a bit of stretch in...
- Patchin’ it, old skool When I saw the tear in the knee of Tristan’s gorgeous new Gap cargo pants, I was more than annoyed. I was disappointed, and frustrated. The boy is hard on his clothes. We hand down a lot of t-shirts in my house, but pants rarely survive to have a boy...

































{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }
How about the fact we have to pay sales tax on pads and tampons?
Let me start by saying, for my own protection, you’ve been wronged and those who have wronged you should be shamed into giving you free stuff.
Pelted with small pebbles
Made to wear clothes without pockets
Made backbench MPP’s in the Ontario Legislature. Perhaps that’s too cruel, there isn’t a lot of fresh air in those backbenches.
Haircuts,Feminine hygiene products,shoes, clothing .Although when one adds up the total difference in prices compared in the newspaper article,not a whopping dollar difference.
Free stuff?!? You’re so right! Free stuff would make it ALL better!
xo Danigirl